Pickle Vs M, VS ONNX vs SavedModel vs TorchScript
Pickle Vs M, VS ONNX vs SavedModel vs TorchScript
Let’s break it down in terms of purpose, use cases, compatibility, and safety:
🥒 Pickle (.pkl)
Pickle is a Python-specific serialization format for objects, including machine learning models.
Feature | Details |
---|---|
Use Case | Serializing Python objects (including scikit-learn, XGBoost models) |
Compatibility | Python-only (tight coupling with specific versions) |
Frameworks | scikit-learn, XGBoost, LightGBM, etc. |
Speed | Fast to load/save |
Portability | ❌ Low — not portable across languages or platforms |
Security | ⚠️ Unsafe to unpickle untrusted data (can execute arbitrary code) |
Deployment | Typically for offline inference or Python-based pipelines |
✅ Best For: Local development, internal tools, reproducible experiments
❌ Not Ideal For: Cross-platform deployment, mobile/edge/cloud scaling
🧠 TensorFlow SavedModel (MD)
SavedModel is TensorFlow’s official format for storing trained models for production use.
Feature | Details |
---|---|
Use Case | Full ML model saving (graph, weights, optimizer, signatures) |
Compatibility | Cross-platform (Python, C++, Java, TensorFlow Serving, TFLite) |
Frameworks | TensorFlow (and Keras models saved via TF backend) |
Speed | Optimized for TF runtime & serving |
Portability | ✅ High — portable to cloud, mobile, web, edge |
Security | Safer than Pickle (no code execution) |
Deployment | Ideal for TF Serving, TFLite conversion, and cloud inference APIs |
✅ Best For: Scalable deployment, mobile/edge/cloud integration, production environments
❌ Not Used For: Non-TensorFlow models (e.g., PyTorch, scikit-learn)
🔍 Summary Table
Feature | Pickle | SavedModel (MD) |
---|---|---|
Framework | scikit-learn, XGBoost, etc. | TensorFlow, Keras |
Format Type | Python object serialization | TensorFlow native model format |
Portability | ❌ Python-only | ✅ Cross-platform |
Deployment Ready | ❌ Dev only | ✅ Production-ready |
Security | ⚠️ Vulnerable if untrusted | ✅ Safer (no code exec) |
Cloud/Edge Ready | ❌ Not ideal | ✅ Fully supported |
🧩 Bonus: When to Use Which?
-
Use Pickle if:
-
You're working within Python end-to-end
-
It's a quick prototype or notebook experiment
-
You're storing classic ML models (like Random Forests, SVMs)
-
-
Use SavedModel if:
-
You're deploying a deep learning model to production
-
You need conversion to TFLite, TF.js, or TensorRT
-
You're integrating with cloud platforms (e.g., TF Serving, Vertex AI)
-
Awesome! Let's dive into comparisons for:
-
✅ ONNX vs SavedModel vs TorchScript
-
✅ Joblib vs Pickle (bonus round)
⚔️ Part 1: ONNX vs SavedModel vs TorchScript
Feature | ONNX | SavedModel | TorchScript |
---|---|---|---|
Primary Use | Cross-framework interoperability | TensorFlow-native deployment | PyTorch-native deployment |
Framework | TF, PyTorch, scikit-learn, etc. | TensorFlow, Keras | PyTorch |
Format | Open standard (runtime-agnostic) | TF’s full model format | PyTorch intermediate representation |
Portability | ✅ High (C++, Java, Python, etc.) | ✅ High within TF ecosystem | ✅ Medium (limited to PyTorch runtimes) |
Cloud Ready | ✅ Azure, AWS, GCP | ✅ GCP, AWS, TF Serving | ✅ TorchServe, SageMaker |
Edge/Mobile | ✅ ONNX Runtime, NVIDIA, mobile-ready | ✅ TFLite, Core ML (via conversion) | ✅ PyTorch Mobile |
Optimization Tools | ONNX Runtime, TensorRT, OpenVINO | TensorRT, TFLite | TorchScript JIT, TorchDynamo |
Model Type | Static (frozen graph) | Static (graph + weights + metadata) | Static/dynamic (compiled from eager) |
Conversion From | PyTorch, TF, XGBoost, LightGBM | Keras, TF models | Eager PyTorch models |
🧠 Quick Use Guide:
-
Use ONNX if you:
-
Need maximum portability (TF → PyTorch, PyTorch → Core ML, etc.)
-
Deploy on different runtimes/platforms
-
Want interoperability across frameworks
-
-
Use SavedModel if you:
-
Stick with TensorFlow/Keras
-
Need TFLite or Core ML conversion
-
Use TF Serving or cloud AI platforms
-
-
Use TorchScript if you:
-
Stick with PyTorch
-
Need optimized model for C++ inference, mobile, or edge
-
Want to compile for performance (JIT)
-
🎯 Part 2: Joblib vs Pickle
Feature | Pickle | Joblib |
---|---|---|
Purpose | General Python object serialization | Optimized for large numpy arrays |
Frameworks | Any Python-based (e.g. scikit-learn) | scikit-learn, numpy-heavy models |
Performance | Slower for large numerical data | Faster with large numpy data |
Compression | No compression | Built-in compression options |
File Size | Larger (no compression) | Smaller (with compression) |
Use Case | Prototyping, small objects | Storing large ML models efficiently |
Compatibility | Python-specific | Python-specific |
Security | ⚠️ Same vulnerability to code exec | ⚠️ Same as Pickle |
✅ When to use which?
-
Use Pickle for:
-
Small models or quick testing
-
Serializing simple Python objects
-
-
Use Joblib for:
-
Large ML models (Random Forests, pipelines)
-
Faster serialization/deserialization
-
Compression and large arrays (e.g., scikit-learn models)
-
💡 TL;DR Summary
-
ONNX = Most portable (use it when switching platforms or frameworks)
-
SavedModel = Best for TensorFlow production workflows
-
TorchScript = Best for PyTorch deployment (especially edge/mobile)
-
Pickle = Quick and dirty, not secure
-
Joblib = Pickle++ for large ML models and numpy-heavy objects
Comments
Post a Comment